by Ashton Tracy
Asking vintage watch enthusiasts which chronographs they might pick as their favorites, one movement quickly comes to mind: the Omega 321.
Their decisions are usually biased by a love of pre-moon Speedmasters the collecting community currently has. Nevertheless, the 321 is an exceptional movement that certainly deserves the praise and attention it receives.
Omega Caliber 321: small but mighty
Caliber 321 is an exceptionally robust, yet elegant chronograph. On the smaller side, it comes in at 27 mm in diameter and a height of 6.74 mm. Compare that to the ubiquitous Valjoux 7750 or the 49-year-old Zenith El Primero, which both come in at a diameter of 30 mm and a height of 7.9 mm and 7.55 mm respectively.
Omega Caliber 321: a brief history
Like much of what occurs in the watch industry, Caliber 321 was the result of a collaboration – with this particular collaboration being between Omega and Lémania.
Beginning life as the CH27 C12 project (and also known as the Lémania 2310), this movement has been used by a host of watch brands including Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet, and Vacheron Constantin, which attests to its quality and workmanship.
The Omega launched in 1946 and, sadly, production ended in 1968.
This caliber was most famously used in the Omega Speedmaster since its inception in 1957 through 1965 and then in the Speedmaster Professional from 1965 through 1968, at which point it was replaced by the Omega 861. The 321 movements also powered other Omega chronographs.
Omega Caliber 321: movement specifics
The Omega 321 is a manually wound chronograph with 17 jewels, a frequency of 2.5 Hz (18,000 vph), and a power reserve of 44 hours. It features a 60-second chronograph register, a 30-minute counter, and a 12-hour counter.
As previously stated, Caliber 321 is a robust, yet elegant movement due to its small stature. The construction is solid with it being able to withstand years of hard wearing.
It utilizes a column wheel, as opposed to a cam, to actuate the chronograph functions. Column wheel chronographs are considered better quality than cams due to their more labor-intensive construction process and smoother operation. They are also generally more visually appealing.
The 321 uses a horizontal clutch to engage the chronograph complication with a coupling wheel that rocks back and forth to toggle it on and off.
The screws are very reminiscent of most vintage Omega models of the 1950s through the 1970s as they are sturdy, thick-headed examples with very thin slots for the driver blade.
Unfortunately, many vintage 321s have less-than-appealing screw heads due to watch repairers not taking proper care of their instruments.
These sturdy screws combined with solid, well-made bridges and cocks result in a very robust movement indeed.
The real beauty of vintage chronograph like the 321 is its capacity for adjustments. Many modern calibers have everything set from the factory, making adjustments to the movement a thing of the past.
The Caliber 321 on the other hand, allows infinitely minute adjustments to ensure precise running of operations and optimized chronometric performance.
One of my favorite aspects of the movement would have to be the minute counting jumper. In many modern chronographs this would be a very simple spring and jumper combined in one.
This construction more than suffices for the job it is required to do as its only function is to ensure the minute counter only advances one tooth forward every 60 seconds when the chronograph is engaged.
Yet when we examine the 321 we can see the quality and craftsmanship of this simple component and the care and attention that has gone into something fairly trivial, we cannot help but be amazed.
Here is a piece that should be merely one plain spring, yet we see three superbly machined pieces interacting with three screws, highlighting what sets this watch above others.
The 321 features an overcoil balance spring and Incabloc shock protection for the balance, ensuring its sturdy reputation.
Omega Caliber 321: conclusion
At first glance the Omega 321 looks similar to many chronographs of its era: most were column wheel by design and feature similar componentry. However, it’s when we compare the small details that we see the Omega really come into its own.
Yes, it’s true that the 321 movement has gained a lot of its popularity due to the current market touting vintage chronographs as so hot right now, but don’t let that take away from what this movement is in its own right: simply wonderful.
Watchmakers and collectors alike have loved this movement long before Speedies were commanding the prices they are today.
And long after the trend is dead, the 321 will remain an exceptional chronograph.
Quick Facts Omega Caliber 321
Production years: 1946 – 1968
Winding: manual
Frequency: 2.5 Hz / 18,000 vph
Diameter: 27 mm
Height: 6.74 mm
Jewels: 17
Power reserve: 44 hours
Functions: hours, minutes, subsidiary seconds, chronograph with 60-second counter, 30-minute counter, and 12-hour counter
You might also enjoy:
Exceptional Movements In History: Rolex Caliber 1575, The Watchmaker’s Watch
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
-
[…] would like to thank both Quill & Pad, Fratello and Hodinkee and Revolution for their excellent articles of both the 321 movement and […]
-
[…] From 1957 to 1968, they used a manually-wound “column wheel” chronograph movement named as “caliber 321”, and it was a watch featuring this movement that NASA put through a series of gruelling tests […]
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!
A significant reason for the size difference is that the 7750 and the El Primero are both automatics, while the 321 is manually wound
Thanks for that, jimf. It is definitely one reason the size can be larger. It was merely a reference point for readers to have a visual picture. Thanks for pointing that out, though.
Bought my Speedmaster 321 in May 1967 while stationed in Germany. Would have bought a Rolex Submariner but didn’t have the extra $25 for the Rolex. Still have the Omega minus the bracelet. Other then a service, some work to fill a rather deep,scratch on a lug, new hands and a crystal, it’s all original.
Im looking for some advice. Have 1962 Speedmaster thats been in family since then. Needs refurbished, any advice on best way to approach?
I’m way late to this party. In all seriousness, (I’m in the States) I would contact Adam Lewis (Lewis Watch Co) in Perth Australia to service anything Omega. I have three Speedmasters by him. Including an outstanding 145.012 with a 321. The DHL each way is three days. Plus, whatever time his schedule allows for restoration/sevicing. I won’t go anywhere else. He has a site and can be found on Instagram too.
I’ve used Official Time Watch in Salt Lake City for service on my flightmaster. Leo provides exceptional service quality and turn around. Don’t let his website sway you with his Rolex service ad, he well qualified in Omega also.
I have a 1962 Omega Seamaster manual wind chronograph with caliber 321as well. It is a well built watch, was gifted to me from my grandfather before he passed, when I was about 16 (now 54). Recently put it in for servicing but, would not let Omega service it for the fact that they would buff the case and take the patina off the dial. To me, the patina gives it, it’s personality and reminds me of my grandfather.
Good idea. My grandfather’s Omega was lovingly serviced by an independent watchmaker and I’m very glad I chose to do it that way.
Great story. Watch collecting is, in the end, about people, love, and memories. It’s nice to know you’re wearing a watch given to you by your grandfather. Just imagine what was going through his heart when he gifted it to you too, passing it on to another generation, knowing his time was limited. Beautiful, loving, hopeful, but also sad.