Why The 2022 Watches And Wonders Geneva Might Be The Last Of Its Kind
Hooray! In only a couple of weeks a flood of watch lovers – yours truly included – will descend on Geneva for the show formerly known as SIHH plus parts of Baselworld, now known as Watches and Wonders Geneva.
As it’s been two years since a proper in-person Geneva fair, I for one wouldn’t miss this one for the world. Some brands have come, and some have gone, but the array of exhibitors at Palexpo will make for great viewing, I am sure – and as always, the true highlights will be the opportunity to reconnect with people I haven’t seen in far too long and the chance to spend quality time with our NorCal Gang traveling squad.
And yet . . .
As I prepare for the trip to Switzerland, the demise of Baselworld is very much on my mind. Unlike some other observers, I don’t think that the death of that show was due to expensive sausages or usurious hotel prices; to me it seems that the era of all-inclusive mega watch shows is rapidly coming to an end for reasons I’ll discuss below.
The natural implication is that Watches and Wonders Geneva will be the next exhibition to change radically or that it will even cease to exist.
Forces of change
Once you start looking for them, the indications of imminent change are all around us.
Year-round introductions: not that long ago, the watch introduction model for most brands worked on an annual cycle built around loading the trade. New pieces were introduced and sold into wholesale and retail distribution at the winter/spring shows, delivered some months later, and then available for sale to consumers.
Having big trade fairs was useful to get the key distribution channel members all in one place and to get a good sense of target production levels for the new watches. But from a publicity perspective in the digital age, the torrent of new watches all at one time began to overwhelm both consumers’ attention spans and journalists’ capacity to comment.
Today, most brands spread introductions across the year, providing “new news” and stimulating interest throughout the calendar year while moderating the crush of all-at-once launches at the annual fairs.
Direct selling and the decline of multi-brand retail: for brands who can establish company-owned retail channels and manage them successfully, the need for a “trade show” simply goes away. In recent years both Richard Mille and Audemars Piguet dropped out of SIHH as they focused on direct distribution. And as other Watches and Wonders brands increase their focus on boutique sales and boutique-only references, we can expect further defections and reductions in participation.
I’m already aware of at least one brand that will be substantially downsizing its 2022 booth size from past years and focusing on a small set of boutique-focused new products.
All things to all people or nothing to everyone? In the decades of my day job in business strategy consulting, I got great mileage from asking a few simple questions. One of the most useful was to respond to a client’s statement that they wanted to launch a promotional campaign, build an innovation function, or broaden their product line by asking “to achieve what?” Too often, companies and institutions launch new efforts – or sustain existing practices past their usefulness – by failing to be clear about what, exactly, they are trying to achieve.
For me, Baselworld fell afoul of this problem in a big way. By trying to serve all sectors of the watch and jewelry industries, cater to the public, serve as the annual focal point for trade dealing, attract collectors, and inform journalists all at once it diluted its mission so substantially that it became impossible meet any stakeholder group’s expectations well. Add infrastructure limitations and bad word of mouth and the result was inevitable.
Meanwhile, more specialized communication and engagement events with a clear view of “what to achieve” are on the rise. Dubai Watch Week’s educational market expansion mission is one notable example, to the extent that it took home the Jury Prize at the 2021 Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève.
Patek Philippe has now staged three of its massive Grand Exhibitions around the globe, both bringing new audiences to horology and reinforcing its brand position atop the pyramid. We have WatchTime New York and other local shows, grassroots organizations like RedBar, charity-oriented brand showcases such as Only Watch, access to new product for established collectors at brand boutiques and specialty retail outlets like the AP Houses, and for the press a rekindling of launch events following the most recent Covid wave.
Zoomification: I’m one of those folks who doesn’t really feel he has a sense of a watch until he sees and holds it, but that may to some extent betray me as an aging member of the enthusiast community. Watches and Wonders seemed to do all right the past two years as a virtual event; it will be interesting to see the extent to which this year’s online elements continue to draw, or even expand, their audiences, putting another nail in the coffin of the massive physical show.
Defectors and free riders: as long as I’ve been going to the Geneva show, there have been satellite displays by independents and non-participating brands outside the walls of Palexpo. Several years ago, the SIHH organization cleverly created the Carré des Horlogers, a popular hall of smaller booths for independents to display their work, attracting a variety of high-visibility makers including Kari Voutilainen, Grönefeld, Laurent Ferrier, and H. Moser et Cie. among others.
Some of those remain at the Carré des Horlogers this year, but several others made the pre-pandemic choice to favor Baselworld’s greater public access over Geneva’s more restricted (and costly) arrangements, and they have stayed away. Others, including long-time main hall exhibitor Greubel Forsey, are notably absent as well.
And it seems that not a day passes without another email notification hitting my inbox about a new exhibit of smaller brands somewhere in or around Geneva during Watches and Wonders. Several brands are showing at hotel suites along the lake; the A.H.C.I. will have its Masters of Horology show every evening at a venue on the Quai des Bergues; eight brands including Singer Reimagined and Schwarz Etienne will be at Barton 7; and so far a list of 30 watch and accessory brands ranging from Louis Erard, Corum, Sinn, and Reservoir to winder maker Scatola del Tempo will be out at HEAD-Genevè for “Time to Watches.”
Watches and Wonders organizer Fondation de la Haute Horlogerie has never been enthusiastic about these remoras hitchhiking on the whale that was SIHH and is now WWG. At some point, the economics of participating at Palexpo, especially given the other factors I’ve set out above, will simply make no sense for more and more of the exhibiting brands. Whether the side shows will persist after the main tent folds is another matter and will be fascinating to watch.
By the way, the explosion of indie and small-brand events during WWG week suggests to me that previous Messe Basel CEO Michel Loris-Melikoff’s final vision for Baselworld before he and organizer MCH group parted ways late last year was pretty much on the mark: a “to achieve what” focused on providing showcases for smaller brands in locations around the world. It’s a shame that he didn’t have the opportunity to follow through as this sort of more targeted “Baselworld” would have filled a clear gap in the world of horological communication and consumer engagement.
Why I could be wrong
Watches and Wonders is doomed, right? I’m certainly going to participate in this year’s show with even more gusto than usual based on the assumption that my analysis is correct, but with the fervent hope that I’m mistaken and that we’ll all be meeting up in Geneva in the spring for years to come.
There are two main reasons that could come to pass.
The brands that matter: with all due respect to Panerai, Hublot, Montblanc, and the rest, there are exactly three exhibitors that matter at WWG from a commercial perspective: Cartier, Patek Philippe, and Rolex/Tudor.
Coincidentally, those three companies also still depend very heavily on third-party distribution and multi-brand retailers, and at least Patek Philippe and Rolex have largely kept to the traditional practice of introducing new products at the big annual fair. For these “big three,” WWG can continue to serve as a true distribution-centered trade fair with enough guaranteed coverage from press and enthusiast outlets to ensure that their messages rise above the clutter. That alone may be enough to keep WWG afloat with at least the other brands in the Richemont sphere continuing to participate as well.
There are watches involved, but it’s all about the people: even in a virtual world, there’s no substitute for getting the world’s watch business leaders and leading enthusiasts in one place at one time to form closer relationships and advance the industry’s interests. It’s harder to put a value on the benefits of those interactions than on the number of watches sold, but just a few side conversations or unexpected deals struck could be just the spark needed to keep WWG alive as it evolves to meet the winds of change.
I’ll be interested to hear your thoughts in the comments below. And if you’re in Geneva for the show week and see me, don’t be bashful! It’s always a treat to see old friends and make new ones, and Watches and Wonders should provide ample opportunities for both.
You may also enjoy:
Why Geneva Watch Days And Dubai Watch Week Are My Favorite Watch Fairs
Why We Love Baselworld: The Show That Never Ends
WatchTime New York Returns, Showcasing Some Of The Most Stunning Timepieces Of 2021
Leave a ReplyWant to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!
Hi Gary, long time reader of your great writing, first time commenter! As someone who is relatively new to the watch hobby, these big shows like WWG or Baselworld sound a bit intimidating to attend in a “but I don’t know anybody so are they going to even give me the time of day” (pun intended) type of way. On the other hand, the smaller ones like Dubai Watch Week sound a lot more welcoming especially with the educational aspect and the chance to speak directly to the independent watchmakers. Maybe my assumption is incorrect – I’d love to hear your perspective on the general ambiance at different shows.
I’ll be waiting to hear how Gary address’ your question. I felt that way entering an AP Corp store in Dallas’ Highland Park Village. I was asked if I had an appointment when there was NO ONE in the store! And then was told that AP wants us to develop a long term relationship (meaning buy our less loved references) to earn your way to the Royal Oak that you really want. Seriously what a bunch of CRAP.
With all due respect, I think what you saw at your AP dealer is a different situation/phenomenon than what I was asking about.
The “coldness” you saw is caused by the runaway popularity and inflated prices of the Royal Oak on the secondary market. Gary actually wrote about this previously – I think the article is something about scarcity and steel sports watches. My local AP dealer told me that their 3 person staff receive dozens of calls daily trying to buy Royal Oaks at retail, some of whom can get quite aggressive and are clearly just looking to make a quick buck by flipping the watch. I’m not surprised that they adopt an initially wary stance with new folks.
My question more had to do with whether the watch collector community at these watch shows is insular or welcoming to new people who want to have fun nerding out about watches.
Hi Tom — sorry to hear about your experience at AP, and I’m sad to say I’ve had similar experiences at some other brands’ outlets and multi-brand stores as well. One well-known dealer in New York couldn’t wait to hustle me out the door — clearly I didn’t fit their preferred torn jeans with t-shirt and Birkin-toting girlfriend demographic.
It’s a topic for longer discussion another time, but to me the idea of reserving certain scarce references for long-time loyal customers is a legitimate relationship management method — in contrast, using access to hot items to help get rid of slow-moving items through bundling is pretty unsavory as a tactic.
More on that later, perhaps!
Hello, Sake! Thanks for reading, and now for taking the time to comment — it’s greatly appreciated.
My experience of the “big” shows is that you definitely need inside contacts to gain hands-on access to the new watches being launched — and in the case of WWG, to even get into the hall you need prior sponsorship from a brand (which costs them money). At least at Basel the public could buy tickets, roam around the outside of the major brand booths, and drop in on some of the smaller brand displays and independent watchmakers — a great deal of the fun.
In my view it’s not that brands don’t want to welcome new (to them) enthusiasts — it’s that, as I argued in this article, they are trying to cover so many bases (dealing with the trade, briefing the press, hosting long-time major customers, etc.) that there simply isn’t time or space to roll out the red carpet for many new people. If in future WWG restructures into, for instance, a closed trade show (wholesale and retail only) plus consumer fairs (a la DWW) around the world, that could be one solution in my view.
If you can go to DWW, by all means do so! The educational aspects are fantastic and the whole event is built around attracting new audiences to watchmaking.
If you do go to Geneva, some of the satellite exhibitions of small brands and indies are much more accessible than the main Palexpo show, so still a good deal to see even if you can’t get access to the big hall.
Thanks again for commenting!
Excellent points Gary!
There is another aspect: this ultra wide formats with tons of brands is an absolute nightmare for journalists. How one Earth will be possible to meet all brands in one week with all spread over Geneva & Palexpo. For a small independent like me, it is physically impossible to see all the brands. It is a nail in the independent journalism’s coffin (if you are not a team of 3 minimum, you got no chance). I will not participate physically and still have 10+ meetings per day. Before this decision I had 8am to 8pm face to face meetings for a week and still refused brands. It is too much…
Smaller, much more informative and world spread events are, in my opinion, better…
Thanks for your thoughts, Dan-Andrei! As an enthusiast attending the fair I have the luxury of picking and choosing among the brands on offer (and then hoping that they have slots available to meet with our collector group) — I can only imagine the toil involved in trying to cover the full assortment. Hope you catch up on your sleep in advance and have plenty of coffee!
Well written GargG!
It takes a tacit understanding of the Swiss’ness of this industry, certainly times have changed and watch products have morphed into a vortex of new arrivals. We are lambasted almost daily with new editions and news on several multi media channels. Social media for once, has been the key to unlocking information in a more correct manner, I see where you are going with this post, in as much as some freedom post-Covid-19 is limiting that in-person visit to most Manufactures, WWG will morph too in the very near future, it must, it will endeavor to perform. I do not believe that the trade show will end here, will it grow? I do not think so, it will further morph into something different come next year ie: 2023.
Personally, I have stopped visiting far off places, it is just too much of a bother. The Swiss Manufactures will like never achieve their in-person visiting by continuing to be stand offish, they are mostly motivated by numbers and more numbers, the SFrs. and their $$. There is no shortage of news that many have their PR teams in disarray, Covid-19 knocked that out of the park, productions have been hampered, and ADs are left in the lurch by this wave of optimism buying that has literally got me bewildered. Are we in a post Pandemic era or is this Covid-19 going to be Endemic? I think that the latter is the more reasonable guess, yet I feel there is a sector that the Manufactures don’t understand, probably in that guesstimating of the end of the era of the Swiss watch show is definitely at hand. Next year will be more diluted, and even more so, the actual watches production will be slower still, and so will the PR display. Swiss’ness at it’s finest form, ENJOY the WWG whilst you can, I for one am rooting for you GaryG. 🙂
I appreciate your thoughtful comments, Prem! I can imagine a new model in which WWG becomes a tightly focused small show for the trade (for brands still selling through distribution), the WWG organization launches distributed consumer shows with a broad array of brands around the world (unless DWW beats them to it), and PR and press relations are spread across the year and handled by the individual brands.
Thanks for the good wishes — I will plan to savor every moment of this year’s event!
Nice article Gary. But wise to end up calling it both ways. As a multi-year attender Inhorgenta, Basel, SIHH and Orogema, now long retired, I think you may have omitted one aspect. For principals of deep-pocketed companies exhibitions may be an ego stroker. 🤔 Your last thought, that the big boys will continue, may be on the button.
Thanks for your thoughts, Timothy! I didn’t consider the “look at me” aspect of brand presence at shows, but probably should have, given some of the displays we’ve seen over the past years. It’s getting to be a pretty expensive form of ego gratification, though!
Hi Gary. I’m planning to go to Geneva during the WWG event but do not have access to the main exhibit. You mentioned some satellite exhibitions. Do you know where I can find information for those? Thanks in advance.
Hi Sonny —
Hope that helps!