by GaryG
As the resident collector here at Quill & Pad, I think it’s important that I share with our readers what goes on in an enthusiast collector’s head as he or she ponders the purchase or sale of a watch, or even considers a fundamental re-shaping of his or her collection.
This is the first in a planned series of “why I bought it” articles that will unfold here over time. Of course, there will be photos – and lots of them – but I hope you’ll find my commentary on a collector’s mindset and the motivations, delights, and possible misgivings behind each individual transaction interesting, too.
Vianney Halter wearing his Deep Space Tourbillon at Baselworld 2014
Let’s start the series off with a bang: my latest addition, the Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon.
The Deep Space Tourbillon by Vianney Halter
Why I bought it
My good friend Terry has a great taxonomy for grouping watches within a collection into three classes. Briefly:
- Fun: pieces bought just because they appeal; usually at a price point at which long-term value isn’t a big concern. In some collections, the “fun” pieces tend to churn more rapidly than others. A recent example in my collection is the new Omega Bullhead. I find it really striking, and if no one else does it doesn’t really affect me one way or the other.
- Investment: meant not in the sense of “pieces I buy in expectation of increasing value,” but rather “pieces with established or predictable market values that form the foundation of a collection.” One of the secrets of amassing a collection worth more than you can really afford is to focus on these sorts of watches – I’ll likely come back to this in a future post. The A. Lange & Söhne Lange Double Split and the Philippe Dufour Simplicity are two examples of this for me.
On edge with the Deep Space Tourbillon
- Patronage: watches bought because they support the efforts of makers (often, but not always, independents) whose ability to continue delighting us with new things depends heavily on the ongoing support of enthusiast collectors. Here we’re talking about watches like my two Kari Voutilainen pieces, and perhaps the Habring2 watches I’ve bought over the years as well.
Passion embodied: the Deep Space Tourbillon by Vianney Halter
- I’ll add a fourth dimension that, for my collector pals and me, runs deeply behind all three of the above: passion. To quote the mother of a former work colleague of mine: “If you don’t love it, don’t buy it!” This helps me to steer clear of many fads, and also keeps me from buying “investment” pieces on the premise that since everyone else loves them, I should as well.
Based on this scheme, the rationale for my purchase of the Deep Space Tourbillon is squarely in the “patronage” category:
- For me, Vianney is one of the true artists of horology. His work is always edgy without (to me) going over the line, and history has already established his Antiqua – which many found shocking at its introduction – as a modern classic. I see the Deep Space Tourbillon as a worthy extension of Vianney’s daring design aesthetic.
Side view of the Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon
- I also find the technical design of the Deep Space Tourbillon stunning to look at, and at the same time technically innovative. I don’t know of another central multi-axis tourbillon, and Vianney’s conception of one is both audacious and (at least to date!) successful.
Central triple-axis tourbillon of the Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon
- I was an early subscriber to the watch. Our small collector group became aware of the existence of the Deep Space Tourbillon in January of 2013, and shortly thereafter I had the opportunity to see a fairly rough (but running) prototype while sitting at the San Francisco airport late at night with Vianney’s marketing chief, Bertrand Bourgeois. The opportunity to get in early as a sponsor of the work was tremendously appealing to me, and the payoff is a special “Voyager” inscription on the case back that only appears on the subscription pieces.
Case back with Voyager inscription reserved for subscribers
- That said, this watch could also be in the “fun” category, although at the price (current retail is 187,500 Swiss francs) one would have to be chortling pretty much non-stop to get a good fun-to-price ratio!
Why I love it
This won’t be a full “wearing impression” review – among other things, I’ve only had the watch for a few weeks!
Already, though, there are a number of things that make me happy with my choice:
- It’s beautifully made. I don’t think that Vianney gets enough credit for the truly excellent finishing of his watches, both movements and cases. This one is no exception – and in addition is much, much more refined than even the second-generation prototype. Additional gilded wheels, changes to the size and color of the quarter-hour indices, and subtle changes to the case and crown dimensions and materials are but a few of the upgrades that make the finished watch truly extraordinary.
- It has the Halter “DNA.” look at the crown of the watch: even though the material (rubber), shape (flat-topped), and color (grey) are different, the grippy nubs remind us of Vianney’s watches from past years, as do the hooded insets between the lugs and other design features.
Side view of the Deep Space Tourbillon accenting the characteristic crown
- It wears beautifully. Yes, it’s big, but the titanium case makes it light, and the way the straps drop down from the lugs results in a great fit, even on my relatively small wrist.
Deep Space Tourbillon on the wrist
- It keeps great time. There’s no second hand, but by observing the position of the tourbillon cage and timing the jumps of the minute hand against my “atomic” desk clock I’m able to conclude that it’s running at about +1 second per day.
- It’s fun to watch. Oh, that tumbling! Absolutely mesmerizing.
- It’s a buddy watch. One of the greatest bits about this watch for me is that I took delivery of mine on the same day as one of my closest friends.
The Deep Space prototype and two finished watches on delivery day
It’s fun. Lots of very serious watchmaking, but in a whimsical form. Even the display box mixes classical and serious: it is a very sober and beautiful blue lacquered box containing a nesting Space Age display stand complete with silver-colored leather. It makes for a great desk display – in the same way that an Antiqua in its winding box can serve as a desk clock, the Deep Space on its stand is lovely to see as it sits on a desk, spinning away.
Deep Space Tourbillon on its desk stand (‘Despicable Me’ Minion not included)
Is it for you?
For those who have the means, is this a watch to consider as part of a collection? In my humble opinion, the Deep Space Tourbillon might be just the thing for you if:
- The design really speaks to you. If you already have some of Max Büsser’s MB&F pieces in the safe and on your wrist, an Antiqua whirring away in its winder, or even a Greubel Forsey with its aggressive expression of brilliant finishing, the Deep Space Tourbillon may well speak your language.
- You have considered other multi-axis tourbillons like the Jaeger-LeCoultre Gyrotourbillon series but they haven’t quite hit the mark for you.
- You are an independent watchmaking fan and see this as a landmark piece worthy of your patronage.
- You have a collection that is heavy on “investment” pieces and you sometimes yearn to see a top-notch, but more unconventional, watch among the assortment in your box.
- The technical virtuosity of the watch blows you away.
- You have a Minion USB stick like mine and he seems lonely without the Deep Space Tourbillon.
- You have the chance to put one on your wrist and just can’t take it off!
GaryG wearing his Deep Space Tourbillon on delivery day (photo courtesy AllenS)
On the other hand, you might want to think twice, or wait and buy later on the pre-owned market, if:
- You demand a high level of certainty about the future value of all of the watches you buy.
- This would be your only watch, or even one of a small collection – unless you have already been through some cycles of consolidation and feel quite confident about your choices.
- The prospect of buying a substantial piece from an independent makes you fret about future servicing and finding replacement parts for maintenance.
- It doesn’t make your pulse race.
One caution: when the Antiqua first came to market, many found it off-putting and even almost barbaric! Naturally, in today’s environment, it is now considered more of a classic.
I don’t expect that many of these watches to be made, so if you are seriously considering the Deep Space Tourbillon you might be well-advised to think ahead: if you can imagine this watch as part of a long-term collection for years to come, you might be well-advised to get on Vianney’s list today.
The Deep Space Tourbillon by Vianney Halter
For more information, please visit www.vianney-halter.com.
Quick Facts Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon
Case: 46 x 48 x 20 mm, Grade 5 titanium
Movement: manual winding Caluiber CH113 with central triple-axis tourbillon, 3 Hz/21,600 vph frequency, 60-hour power reserve
Functions: hours, minutes
Price: 202,500 Swiss francs (without shipping and taxes)
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
-
[…] I know it isn’t on the same level as a Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon or a Greubel Forsey Invention Piece 1 (oh, so many objects of desire! GaryG, I envy you!), but it […]
-
[…] It’s no secret that I’m a big fan of Vianney Halter and his work (see Why I Bought It: Vianney Halter Antiqua and Why I Bought It: Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon). […]
-
[…] my friend Terry’s collecting taxonomy (described in more detail in Why I Bought It: Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon), the Double Split definitely falls in the “investment” realm: a piece with fairly predictable […]
-
[…] article was first published on July 7, 2014 as Why I Bought It: Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon. You may find the comments underneath the original article […]
-
[…] I know it isn’t on the same level as a Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon or a Greubel Forsey Invention Piece 1 (oh, so many objects of desire! GaryG, I envy you!), but it […]
-
[…] based on great stories such as Vianney Halter’s dream that led to the Deep Space Tourbillon (see Why I Bought It: Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon) or the remontoire mechanism of the Oldenzaal town clock that inspired the Grönefeld 1941 (see […]
-
[…] I have already written here about why I bought Vianney Halter’s most recent creation, the Deep Space Tourbillon (see Why I Bought It: Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon). […]
-
[…] I have already written here about why I bought Vianney Halter’s most recent creation, the Deep Space Tourbillon (see Why I Bought It: Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon). […]
-
[…] Why I Bought It: Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon and Why Philippe Dufour Matters. And It’s Not A Secret […]
-
[…] my friend Terry’s collecting taxonomy (described in more detail in Why I Bought It: Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon), I’d have to classify this purchase at the time that it was made as a “fun” acquisition; and […]
-
[…] my friend Terry’s collecting taxonomy (described in more detail in Why I Bought It: Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon), the Double Split definitely falls in the “investment” realm: a piece with fairly predictable […]
-
[…] his collection, and why you should, or shouldn't, do the same. Please click the link for more: http://quillandpad.com/2014/07/15/wh…ce-tourbillon/ __________________ In Rotation: Accutron Spaceview T Case (1970), Fortis 597.20.71 M" […]
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!
I’m being torn in several directions and don’t know which reply to type first.
Do I start with “OMG YOU GOT ONE!’?
Or perhaps “I love his watch. I love it for its whimsical wackiness, I love it for reasons that are purely visceral. Because I’m shallow”.
Patronage – funny thing. I have used this exact word when talking to people who have been thinking about buying indies but worried about things like investment, value etc, because in a rather significant way, that’s how I see i, as a modern version of the old-fashioned patronage of the arts, as a way of promoting and sustaining an art form (or two or three).
Many congratulations to you! Although I have so far only managed to get my greedy mitts on the Deep Space for about two minutes, gee it’s a lot of fun. As is the Bullhead.
Shallow? Nay, fair maiden! Visceral reactions and in particular a deep affection for whimsy are completely legitimate motivations, in my view — and perhaps even more authentic than any sort of over-intellectualized navel-gazing about buying motivations (although the latter did make for a somewhat meatier article in this case, no?).
Another one of our buddy Terry’s dicta about collecting is that it’s the rationale behind each piece and how it fits into a larger whole that distinguishes “collecting” from “buying.” I haven’t sorted that one out fully for myself, but it seems a reasonable starting point for a long lunch or dinner with watch-loving friends.
In my own tiny way, I’m a fervent advocate for patronage — and pleased that the term also holds meaning for you.
Finally, I’m very happy that you also mention the Bullhead! Perhaps that one should be next for my “Why I Bought It” series, as it sits at a very different point on the affordability scale yet (as you suggest) is packed with fun and (for me) just wonderfully appealing.
Thanks for your thoughtful remarks!
Great text and congratulations for the buy! Vianney’s web site is saved on my favorites websites list wiht the name DREAM WATCH, sometimes I go there to the see the pictures and keep feeding my dream!
Keep your dream alive! I started quite small in the world of watches, and only over many years have reached the point of being able to include watches like this in my collection. Passion works at all price points — and there are definitely “objects of desire” for me that exist only in my dreams so far as well!
Thank you for taking the time to reply to my ramblings. Would you and your friend Terry consider a few other additions to ‘collecting’ vs ‘buying’? Such as ‘random accumulation’? 🙂
I know that everyone has a different definition for what constitutes a ‘collector’ or the art of ‘collecting’, and it is easy to disappear up one’s proverbial when discussing such things, although I do have a genuine interest in the topic (perhaps I should meet Terry). For me, at any rate, and this is why although I have been a ‘collector’ of some things, a ‘collector of watches’ I am not, the existence of a theme (or more than one), the idea of classification, categorisation, continuation, of each new item adding to the ‘whole’ in a way that is immediately recognisable, these are some of the things that to me, distinguish a ‘collection’.
One of the nice things about living in the internet age is the ability to support more types of creators, whether they are like Vianney Halter or Barn the Spoon (yes that’s his name) who whittles his wooden spoons, made from salvaged wood, and occasionally sells them from a small ‘window display’ of a shop in the East End of London. Patronage comes in many forms, and all power to it!
You have met Terry, at least briefly, on a certain Wednesday evening earlier this year — he’s a private fellow, though, so no photos or deeper descriptions here or elsewhere.
Gotta check out some of those spoons! Patronage does indeed come in many forms, and while I am not aware of the appropriate diminutive for “Modern Medici” I concur that advancing good art and craft is something that is accessible to one and all — we only need to find the worthy creators who stoke our passions.
Dear Gary,
thanks for sharing! It’s great to get first-hand impressions from a true collector, especially when independent masterpieces like the Vianney Halter are involved. Your article is all about passion and enthusiasm, and that is in my opinion the best guidance in collecting watches!
Nick
Thanks for your comment, Nick! For whatever reason, I’m just crazy about timepieces, and those from independents like Vianney are very high on my list.
It’s been great to meet other like-minded folks in this hobby — I hope that you are pursuing your passion, and wish you all the best.
Hi Gary,
I think this blog is super dope. I ran across it after watching a kind of lame YouTube video compilation of “beautiful watch mechanisms” and looking up the Vianney Halter Deep Space Tourbillon, the only watch that made me cry a little. Being the dumb 20-something-year-old I am, I half-hoped that it was purchasable. But. I was wrong lol. And then I found this blog, and this post, and I am really happy to have been introduced to the world of watch-collecting in this way? As I read your post I realized that watchmaking is truly an art form. And it makes me happy that there are people like you and others on this blog who really appreciate it and really love writing about it.
Sorry this was kind of random but just had to write nice things on this blog because it is so nice. Please keep doing your thang! And collecting beautiful watches :).
– J