What Makes A Daily Wearer Wristwatch?
by GaryG
In the first article I ever wrote here at Quill & Pad, I expressed my strongly held view that all watches were made to be worn – and that if you can’t afford to break them, you shouldn’t buy them! (See Why You Can’t Afford To Buy Your Watch If You Can’t Afford To Break It.)
That said, while I wear each and every one of the watches in my collection from time to time, some watches are more suited to daily wear than others.
In a response to one of my recent Quill & Pad articles, Chris B asked, “Inquiring minds want to know, what are your favorite daily wearers?” His question got me thinking, both about which pieces in my assortment are the go-to routine watches for frequent wear and, at a more fundamental level, what makes a watch a “daily wearer.”
Not just sport
I’m guessing that if you did a poll of what folks think of as a daily wearer, you’d get a lot of votes for pieces such as the Rolex GMT-Master and Omega Speedmaster: robust workhorses (I will not use the term “beater” here as it seems to inflame the emotions of some of our gentle readers) that keep good time, can take a licking, and can cover a range of wearing occasions from beach to boardroom.
If you’re Bill Gates, a more modest Casio Illuminator apparently does the trick; and in my collection the daily-wear watch that matches this category most closely is my Vacheron Constantin Overseas “Deep Stream” Chronograph.
It could just as well be my Rolex Batman GMT-Master, but truth be told I almost never wear that watch! Good news, I suppose, for its future owner as the piece is in virtually as-new condition.
On other days when I’m hankering for a sporty look, I don’t hesitate to slap on my vintage and seemingly indestructible Omega Ploprof. It’s perhaps marginal as a true daily wearer as its somewhat outlandish appearance does tend to draw attention, but since I do wear it without reservation I’ll leave it on my list.
But if “daily wearer” were limited to the concept of pure sport watches I think we’d be missing a lot.
We’re all aware of the entire category of what I’ll call dress-sport watches, including pieces like the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak (at least in its simpler incarnations, and for me leaving out the Offshore line) and Patek Philippe Nautilus. These watches are frequent wearers for many, and, current market mania for steel Nautilus pieces aside, have certainly benefited from the shift to more casual styles in the workplace.
For me, this niche is filled by my Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso Grande GMT; arguably a dress watch at its core but in steel and on its fitted steel bracelet a watch comfortable in a wide range of environments.
One step dressier: the tweeners
Before we’re done here, I promise to come back to a few dressy and flashy pieces I don’t consider daily-wear watches. But for now let’s continue working our way up the spectrum from sporty to formal.
It’s at this next in-between level that we find wearable watches such as the Tsunami from Hajime Asaoka and 1941 Remontoire by the Grönefeld brothers, both of which I own in steel and wear with some frequency. And I realize that those are somewhat on the pricey end of the scale, so for the purpose of this discussion I’d also include my Timex Marlin re-issue, Jaeger-LeCoultre Tribute to Reverso 1931, and Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra-Thin in the mix.
It’s also at this level that some of my limited set of vintage “dress” watches come into play, from a few of my grandfather’s more heavily worn steel wristwatches to my Jaeger-LeCoultre Futurematic and the first watch I ever bought for myself, my early 1970s Bucherer chronometer.
All of the watches I’ve mentioned so far are in white metal cases – in fact, all are steel – but upon further thought that’s not a necessity for me when considering daily wear.
For example, there’s the vintage Vacheron Constantin Reference 4560 that I bought last year at auction and have worn at least five days per month since: a yellow gold watch on a yellow gold bracelet.
What makes it a “daily wear” watch when other similar pieces would be way too blingy? For me it’s a combination of its charming, somewhat time-worn look and the light weight of the bracelet that makes the watch much less imposing than other full-gold watches.
Full dress stealth
I suppose I’m now getting a sense of why some folks are saying that the contemporary formal dress watch is an endangered species – like our Martin Green in The Death Of The Dress Watch: Is It Time To Write Its Obituary?
So far, we’ve talked about a lot of sporty and more casual watches as well as some golden oldies. And as the frequency of my own formal client interactions has begun to taper off, I do find that some of my traditional standbys are, for lack of a better term, standing by more and more.
There are some exceptions: at least when I’m wearing long sleeves, I’m not reluctant to don watches like the whimsical-but-stealthy Upside Down by Ludovic Ballouard, my first-generation Géographique from Jaeger-LeCoultre, or even the super-complicated but anti-bling Equation of Time by Audemars Piguet in white gold with dark grey dial.
I’m not going to change the oil in my car or scrub the railings on the patio (yes, I still do both of those) wearing any of these, but for tooling around town on errands and meeting up with friends, each provides a jolt of pleasure when seen peeking out from under the cuff while not attracting undue attention.
Definitely not daily wearers – at least for me, not right now
If all of these various types, sizes, and brands of watches can be worn on a daily basis, what’s left out?
For me, special-occasion watches include the tourbillons in my collection as well as some of the flashier pieces – which makes the A. Lange & Söhne Pour le Mérite Tourbillon on its fitted gold bracelet a double qualifier.
And while I have a real love for dress chronographs, the formality of pieces like the Patek Philippe Reference 5370P and Voutilainen Masterpiece Chronograph II, as well as the striking pink gold case of the latter, make them dress-up watches rather than knocking-around pieces as my lifestyle becomes less structured and increasingly outdoor.
My Philippe Dufour Simplicity? In many ways it’s an almost ideal watch for daily wear with its white metal case, 37 mm diameter, and simple lacquered dial adding up to a physical presence that’s unlikely to stand out enough to cause a ruckus. Unless you’re at a watch enthusiasts’ gathering, that is!
That said, the run-up in value of that piece makes me just a bit nervous about wearing it quite as frequently as I used to, which is a shame.
So, what does make a daily wearer?
Looking over the lists of yeses and nos above, I’m seeing a few decision rules for classifying a watch as a piece for routine wear.
Comfort: I do like wearing heavy watches, but on a day-in, day-out basis I find it nice to have pieces that have somewhat lower heft on my wrist. Comfort also includes the absence of nagging details: I owned and wore an Omega Speedmaster for a while, but the jagged edge of the deployant clasp closure eventually drove me nuts, and the watch had to go.
Robustness: No matter how careful you are, if you wear a watch a lot you are going to bang it from time to time. Robust movement construction, hardy case materials, and a profile low enough on the wrist that you’re not going to knock your watch into every doorknob you pass are all positive features in a world of bumps and bruises. And when those knocks do occur, the piece has to be one for which you are content to consider dings as signs of personality rather than horrifying scars.
Stealth: Perhaps I’ve gotten more circumspect as I’ve aged, but these days I’m less likely to wear conversation pieces like the Vianney Halter Antiqua as part of my daily routine. And that isn’t just true of more formal or costly pieces; some “casual” watches, like the Konstantin Chaykin Joker, also are only occasional wearers for me due to their striking aesthetics.
Versatility: Going to the opera? A specialized piece like a Vacheron Constantin skeleton is just the ticket. But if you’re going to have one watch on for several days, it needs to be appropriate for whatever range of activities make up your week.
Personal appeal: All of that said, let’s have no boring watches! That Timex of mine is a recreation of the first watch I ever owned and brings back pleasant memories every time I have it on my wrist. And a piece like my Vacheron Constantin Overseas has enough cool facets and contrasts that I’m tempted to give it a second look whenever I check the time, no matter how frequently I wear it.
Thanks very much, Chris B, for getting me thinking about the whats and whys of daily-wear watches. I’ll look forward to hearing others’ views on your own frequent wearers in the comments below. Happy wearing!
You may also enjoy:
Why You Can’t Afford To Buy Your Watch If You Can’t Afford To Break It
Great Rolex Experiment With The GMT-Master II Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Crown
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!
Overseas gets the most time on my wrist, too. The strap choices give it a new look when I tire of the bracelet (which admittedly is rarely). I wanted that Reverso Tribute to 1931 for ages until recently discovering rectangular cases just aren’t for me – it’s the best Reverso I’ve seen. The very epitome of a piece that falls perfectly between sporty and dressy, and keeps it ultra-simple.
If I had your collection though, the Gronefeld would get the most wrist time. To hang with the price.
If I had Gary’s collection, I would just drop the mic. Can’t think of a better one among all the people I know. And I do agree with your assessment on that JLC Tribute to 1931!
Drop the mic…haha! I’ve certainly never seen the likes of it. Mind you, we’ve not seen Abayomi Mumuni’s collection yet (you might remember him from the comments on such articles as ‘Why I bought it: Patek Philippe reference 3940P-027 Vintage Collection’). He has like three times more watches than anyone.
Yeah, but is it as diverse with the addition of the indies, including – gasp – a Philippe Dufour?
He’s got 3 Dufours. A Simplecity, a Dualto, and a Tri-Force.
Damn.
There are a number of quite private collectors out there whose assortments would blow all of us away! I’m privileged to know some and there are others out there who are completely out of the public view, I am sure!
It’s hard to resist the Overseas! It’s interesting how specific the taste for rectangular watches is — I love them (and my broad, flat wrist favors them) but I know lots of folks (yourself included) for whom they just don’t do the trick.
The Gronefeld does get a lot of time on my wrist, please be assured!
Best, Gary
Grand Seiko snowflake fills all blanks , pool to board rooms to beach to worship places to change a car puncture to a fine dining. Scratch free light dressy and draws a… Wow ! attention..
Grand Seiko is a great choice for a daily wearer! Glad you are enjoying yours — and thanks for commenting!
Best, Gary
In my line of work, robustness is key. I’ve even had a G-Shock fail on me!
Well, I’m glad you’ve survived the shocks associated with your profession! Anything that will cause a G-Shock to fail is pretty remarkable, I’d say.
For me robustness is certainly a consideration, but for days when I know that the agenda contains things like office work and running to the store for milk I do pull out some pieces that are a bit more delicate.
Stay safe!
Best, Gary
Thanks for the follow up! If I’m not willing to wear it almost daily in San Francisco, not buying it. I mostly daily a JLC Reverso.
Thanks for the inspiration! Reverso is for me a great choice melding durability, good looks, strong watchmaking, and enough stealth to make it a wearable urban piece.
Best, Gary
The only watch I almost wear everyday in the past two years is my Urban Jurgensen. The reason is quite simple: I want to enjoy my best watch as much as possible.
And that makes total sense to me!
I agree with Elizabeth — and you!
Best, Gary
It’s a stunner, Chia-Ming.
Thanks for the very interesting article! I enjoyed reading about all your choices.
I’m a firm believer of your opening statement: if you can’t afford to break it, don’t buy it. I take that a step further and believe that if I can’t bear for it to be scuffed, then I shouldn’t be buying it either, no matter how much I love the watch.
This means that my reasonably new least inexpensive watch already has very small scratches. While these caused a twinge of pain when I first saw them, that also created emotions in me that said this watch was a part of me and my life. In that sense, the watches I want to wear, and which become part of my life, are all daily wear watches, even if impractical.
I recently went to an amusement park with my daughter wearing a sports mechanical watch of some quality. We decided to give the high striker/hammer bell thing a go. When I grabbed the hammer, it dawned on me that the designers of my watch probably didn’t factor in the very hard impact vibrations I was about to subject it to, but I went ahead anyway (much to my daughter’s delight). Moments like these bring more meaning to owning the watch which make it, at least in my own mind, ‘my’ daily beater.
My choice for daily wear comes down to two things: propriety and fashion (i.e. does it match what I wear), and I find the watches I have tend to reflect the different aspects of my lifestyle. That said, I have yet to find the perfect couch potato watch.
Thanks for these personal comments, Brighty! It’s great to hear how your watches have become integral parts of your experiences and memories.
Let me know if you find that couch potato piece!
Best, Gary
On reflection, may I suggest the Simplicity as a couch potato piece? Surely, one of the safest environments for it…but don’t reach between the cushions for the remote.
I am a big fan of steel PVD watches because it allows me to wear a nice watch whilst not having to worry about any damage because of the layer of resistance the compound metal gives to the watches’ base metal. A great example of this kind of watch is the Berkeley Black Knight chronograph, which is very difficult to damage and is still a fantastic quality watch fit for any occasion.